It is inherently dangerous to a democracy for all of its telecommunications infrastructure to be held in the hands of unelected and unaccountable private actors with no obligation to behave in a nondiscriminatory manner. Municipal networks by their nature answer directly to the local community and their policies are subject to scrutiny and modification by public action, if need be at the ballot box. The preservation of a system of mixed public and private ownership of telecommunications infrastructure is essential to maintaining the free flow of information unfettered by the economic interests of dominant private actors. ,
Tag Cloud
audio
bristol virginia utilities
Burlington Telecom
comcast
competition
cook county
economics
fcc
florida
FTTH
incumbent
iowa
lafayette
lawsuit
legislation
maps
minnesota
misinformation
monticello
muni
network neutrality
north carolina
open access
preemption
public interest
qwest
rural
stimulus
tennessee
tim nulty
utah
utility
utopia
verizon
Vermont
video
virginia
washington
Wi-Fi
Wireless
Links
- App-Rising
- Baller Herbst Law Group
- Blandin on Broadband
- Broadband Properties
- Cook's Collaborative Edge
- Design Nine Blog
- Digital Redwoods
- Fast Roads - New Hampshire
- Fibernet Monticello
- Fighting the Next Good Fight
- Free Press
- Free UTOPIA
- Iowa Municipals
- Isen.blog
- Keep Us Connected - Illinois
- Lafayette Pro Fiber
- Mountain Area Information Network
- Network St. Paul
- New Rules Project
- Public Knowledge
- Reclaim the Media
- Salisbury FTTH Blog
- Save NC Broadband
- Save the Internet
- Southern Berkshire Technology Committee
- Susan Crawford
- Syracuse Municipal Broadband Initiative
- Tales of the Sausage Factory
- TeleTruth
- Tennessee Fiber Optics Communities
- The Red, Blue, and Green
- Wireless Future Blog
- iPaloAlto