When it comes to broadband, I’m a socialist. Why? Because broadband service in the United States is currently provided by a cableco/telco duopoly, and, as such, is slower and more expensive than in most of the developed world, studies show. Because I don't believe the FCC can fix that lack of competition within the current regulatory framework, despite the ambitious goals set forth in its National Broadband Plan. Because a reasonably-priced alternative to cable or telco broadband might be just the thing to bring competition to the industry and spur U.S. broadband cost and quality to world-class levels. Because our connectedness increasingly dictates our our economic standing in the world: Broadband is as important to us as the interstate highway system--a public works project--was to Eisenhower-era America.
at&t audio broadband bits cable chattanooga colorado comcast competition county economic development fcc fiber-to-the-business financing FTTH gigabit I-Net incumbent interview jobs legislation lobbying minnesota misinformation muni network neutrality north carolina open access podcast policy preemption public v private referendum regulation rural school services state laws stimulus tennessee time warner cable utility video washington Wi-Fi Wireless