The question should not be whether to invest in fiber or wireless any more than one would ask whether shoes are “better” than hats. Ultimately, they solve different problems and neither one offers a one size fits all solution.
Bill to Limit Competition in North Carolina Clears Senate, Headed to House
Once again, Senator Joe Sam Queen again led the effort to legislate on behalf of the people of North Carolina rather than a few companies headquartered out of state. On Monday night, the Senator offered an amendment to remove the temporary ban on community networks (currently set to be one year - though powerful lobbyists will undoubtedly push to extend it). Unfortunately, the Senate ultimately passed the bill with the ban.
The Salisbury Post had covered the legislative battle last week, revealing yet another horrendous quote from Senator Hoyle, who has pushed the ban on community broadband infrastructure.
We're not going to get broadband to everybody in the state anytime soon.
This was his response to a question noting the nature of private companies like Time Warner (who donate regularly to Hoyle) to ignore communities they deem unprofitable.
To reconstruct:
- No one expects the private sector to serve the entire state - no one disputes that companies like Time Warner will refuse to invest in small, isolated communities
- Senator Hoyle, the main proponent of protecting Time Warner monopolies where they exist, simply says that these people just won't get Internet
- The majority of Senators vote with Hoyle to deny people, who have no broadband option, from building it themselves
Unreal.
Now we wait to see when it will pop up in the House. Without a larger grassroots uprising, it will slowly work its way through Committees and toward the House Floor. Call your Reps. To follow this issue in real time, I recommend periodically searching twitter for ncbb.

Comments
<> Indeed. Hoyle is fanning
<>
Indeed. Hoyle is fanning the classic circular debate whose only goal is delay. It goes like this:
"We need better telecom infrastructure to meet our current and future needs."
"Yes, but it isn't profitable to build it."
"But we still need it"
"I know. But it isn't profitable."
And round and round it goes. Instead of engaging in such bullshit circular debates like those fostered by Hoyle, we should be pursuing alternative, nonprofit business models that build the IP-based telecom infrastructure this nation needed yesterday, today and tomorrow. Lack of profitability is no excuse not to act.
Post new comment